Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 22 post(s) |

Anja Talis
Mimidae Risk Solutions
40
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 18:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
The link on the Caldari progression image is broken.
(also, can you resize those images? I can't actually read them in a browser, because they are either too big, or too small!) |

Anja Talis
Mimidae Risk Solutions
40
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 18:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
Orion GUardian wrote:I Blackbird for example was an easy to train for ship, it will be prolonged for about a week now (doesn't sound much, but if you are a newbie that is quite some time!) Especially as it stands today that Destroyers are very rarely used and considered "useless" by alot of people.
The points of this sort of change is so that CCP can rebalance easier and make sure ships like destroyers have useful roles.
Look forwards, not backwards :D |

Anja Talis
Mimidae Risk Solutions
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 18:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
YouShouldntEatIt wrote: The only thing about this that doesn't make sense to me is to fly a battlecruiser (essentially a bigger cruiser) requires the cruiser skill. so why shouldn't a recon (essentially a bigger covert op) require covert op skills?
Of course, this is just how I view the ship progression in eve. Maybe it's because I grew up with the current system >.>
Yeah. Ignoring the class size tiers, the current system did make sense. Doesn't mean it should stay that way though.
|

Anja Talis
Mimidae Risk Solutions
40
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 18:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
ITTigerClawIK wrote:first thing i thought after reading about the skill changes was "all those guys in null sec will be fighting tooth and nail in frigates cause barely anyone will have trained destroyers" and on another note of that at least add another 1 or 2 destroyers to actualy make that class worth even moving into after frigate.
oh yeah! Add some more destroyer types! |

Anja Talis
Mimidae Risk Solutions
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 23:25:00 -
[5] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote: CSM NOT INCLUDED?!:
[list]
I will be honest by saying this is due to my own failure here, please do not blame CCP, or any other employee on that matter. I just plainly and simply forgot to include them in the feedback process; I know that sounds incredibly stupid, unbelievable or even naive, but you have to realize that between various work duties, procedures that have to be followed, internal meetings and reviews, random design emergencies, questions that pop-up from your team, plus being split into different projects that have to be finished in time, you are bound to forget things in the heat of the moment for being tremendously busy.
Doh :)
My workplace has a usergroup and we routinely forget to put stuff before them before telling the world. They then get annoyed and rant at us similarly. I know how you feel! 
Nice one for 'fessing up though! |

Anja Talis
Mimidae Risk Solutions
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 23:31:00 -
[6] - Quote
Harrigan VonStudly wrote: Claiming forgetfulness and/or individual fail works once, maybe twice. But the pattern has and is showing itself to be, well, a typical pattern. In other words; we see this as a bullshit lie and excuse to try and cover CCP's typical way of business.
tl;dr Don't **** down my neck and tell me it's raining
Actually, it's really easy to do this if that review stage isn't a formal part of the review process. I.e. just tacked on the end. I know from similar experiences. |
|
|